Preliminary Analyses
For girlss (come across Desk dos), the two extremely portrayed mature attachment appearance was in fact safer attachment (31%; letter = 26) and you may fearful-avoidant attachment (twenty-eight.6%; n = 24), if you are for males, the absolute most illustrated mature attachment appearances was safer (38.5%; n = 20) and dismissing (thirty-six.5%; letter = 19). It’s important to emphasize the preoccupied connection design try improperly depicted within the men (3.8%; letter = 2), symbolizing 14.3% of our own test (N = 12).
An initial MANOVA, using the Wilk’s test (Rao’s approximation), was performed with the raw scores of the attachment (adult attachment style-secure, dismissing, anxious-preoccupied, and fearful-avoidant) as the dependent variables and with gender, education, and current family situation, as well as their interactions, as the explanatory variables. Education [F(4, 118) = 3.236, p = 0.015], current family situation [F(sixteen, 321) = 1.704, p = 0.045), and the interaction between gender and education [F(twelve, 271) = 2.115, p = 0.016] were found to significantly influence the attachment scores for participants.
Some you to definitely-method ANOVAs have been completed to take notice of the relationships between your oriented varying brutal many the new attachment looks therefore the explanatory variables off education and you can current family relations state, additionally the communication between them. If recenzja pussysaga you find yourself none of those Aeters was found to be high. The outcome show, such as, that professionals that has a senior school education was in fact associated with the a decrease in anxious-preoccupied accessory concept, and it is in the a growth whilst interacts with the family relations situations, in addition to better increase try utilized in those individuals professionals which have good high-school studies and therefore are partnered.
The significant associations between attachment styles were examined further by non-parametric testing (i.e., Kruskal–Wallis test) using a Monte Carlo method with 10,000 simulations and p < 0.05. The findings revealed several significant relationships between attachment scores (K = , p < 0.0001). The Steel–Dwass–Critchlow-Fligner procedure for multiple comparisons revealed that scores for the anxious-preoccupied attachment style were significantly different from the other attachment styles (see Figure 1).
Taken together with her, towards the intense scores into the mature connection styles, new brutal score to have nervous-obsessed connection appearances mostly change from those people into the almost every other attachment looks. A subsequent studies is actually hence set to choose hence of explanatory details, or no, affected these intense results towards stressed-possessed attachment looks.
An ANOVA was therefore performed to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables of gender, education, and current family situation and the anxious-preoccupied attachment scores. The overall model was significant [F(8, 122) = 2.193, p = 0.032], and only gender was found to significantly influence anxious-preoccupied attachment scores [F(step one, 129) = 6.176, p = 0.014]. The post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test indicated that the mean score for females (Mfemale = 3.325, SD = 0.374) was significantly different from the mean score for males (Mmale = 2.625, SD = 0.363). Taken together, these results indicate that women have higher levels of anxious-preoccupied scores for attachment compared with men.
Investigation of your Association Anywhere between Dysfunctional Habits, Attachment Appearances, and you will Demographic Variables
Because shown from inside the Desk step 3, the most popular dysfunctional behaviors then followed was in fact communications (Letter = 102), accompanied by delivering material (Letter = 37) and you will managing behaviors (letter = 25). Within this low-systematic take to, most other more severe dysfunctional practices integrated 7 dangers, around three injuries, you to assets destroy, without hostility.
Fearful and preoccupied participants had been discovered to be overrepresented getting interaction and defamation, correspondingly. A maximum of 91.2% (N = 31) out of fearful users made use of communications as his or her impaired behavior [? ( step three ) 2 = seven.98, p = 0.046, V = 0.25], while 29% (N = 5) from preoccupied players utilized defamation as their impaired conclusion [? ( 3 ) 2 = six.25, p = 0.019, V = 0.22]. Off trying help, obsessed participants be seemingly more prone to see elite group assist, when you find yourself nothing of your dismissing users proclaimed to inquire about to have help [? ( step three ) 2 = 8.21, p = 0.042, V = 0.28].